Decision Intelligence for People Operations

Make better decisions in less time, audit-ready.

An AI engine that fits into your talent stack. It evaluates every person against the standard you set, cites its evidence and keeps the audit trail ready, without changing how you work.

Request a demo See how it works

One engine for

Hiring
Performance reviews
Internal mobility & promotions

My VacanciesProject Manager, Digital OperationsCandidates

Candidate pool

Adjusting the threshold or selecting a score range only changes this dashboard view. It does not advance or reject candidates.

66%· 14 above threshold

Score distribution & threshold
Matching score	Total candidates	Above threshold	Below threshold	Incomplete evidence	Contrary evidence
0–4%	0	0	0	0	0
5–9%	0	0	0	0	0
10–14%	0	0	0	0	0
15–19%	0	0	0	0	0
20–24%	0	0	0	0	0
25–29%	0	0	0	0	0
30–34%	1	0	1	0	0
35–39%	3	0	3	0	0
40–44%	1	0	0	1	0
45–49%	3	0	3	0	0
50–54%	3	0	3	0	0
55–59%	4	0	4	0	0
60–64%	3	0	3	0	0
65–69%	2	2	0	0	0
70–74%	3	3	0	0	0
75–79%	4	3	0	0	1
80–84%	2	2	0	0	0
85–89%	3	3	0	0	0
90–94%	1	0	0	1	0
95–100%	1	1	0	0	0

Above threshold
Complete must-have evidence · below threshold
Incomplete evidence
Contrary must-have evidence

Profile comparison

14 of 34 candidates above threshold

Total candidates3431complete evidence14above threshold

Incomplete evidence · 2 candidates
Contrary must-have evidence · 1 candidates

Criteria impact

A weight of 10 creates a must-have gate and also contributes to the weighted score. Weights 1–9 affect the score without becoming gates.

Sort by

Awarded, funded andrecognised by.

How BlindStairs works

Validate the criteria. The engine does the heavy lifting. You decide with confidence and evidence.

Define the standard together. BlindStairs prepares the evidence and the review path. Your team keeps the final decision.

Co-define the standard

BlindStairs proposes the requirements from the vacancy. Your team validates them and sets how much each one matters; weight 10 makes it a must-have.

Project Manager, Digital OperationsMatching criteria

Experience2
- 3+ years managing cross-functional projects end to end
  Must-have
  10/10
  Why it matters: The role owns delivery across IT, finance and operations from the first week.
- Has led a digital or operations transformation project
  Very important
  8/10
  Why it matters: The team is replacing core operations tools over the next 18 months.
Project management3
- Runs delivery with Agile/Scrum (sprints, backlog, reviews)
  Very important
  7/10
  Why it matters: Delivery teams already plan in two-week sprints.
- Owns project budgets and cost forecasting
  Important
  6/10
  Why it matters: Each project carries its own budget and monthly forecast.
- PMP, PRINCE2 or equivalent project management certification
  Important
  5/10
  Why it matters: Signals a shared vocabulary for planning, risk and change control.
+3 more groupsLanguages · Education · Soft skills5

Process every source

BlindStairs cleans and structures documents, assessments, interviews and internal feedback. It applies the approved standard consistently, while sources, gaps and conflicts stay visible.

Sociodemographic signals are anonymised before inference.

EU AI ActArt. 10Data & governance

Pau Vidal

Logistics operations lead running improvement projects

Quick Interview · CompletedSoft skills · Done

Evaluation coverage

90%

CV· 7/10 evaluated(+7)
Recorded interview· 9/10 evaluated(+2)
Pending evaluation1

Round 1 · Screening callRecorded

Requirements evaluated from this interview5

Has led a digital or operations transformation project
Pending evaluationNot met04:05 - 04:31
Keeps stakeholders informed of progress, risks and decisions
Pending evaluationMet09:41 - 09:58

+3 more add to earlier evidence

Decide with evidence

See every requirement with the source and excerpt that supports it, or an honest “Not stated” that tells you what to ask or review next. BlindStairs prepares the record. Your team decides.

EU AI ActArt. 13Transparency

Pau Vidal

Logistics operations lead running improvement projects

Below threshold

What limits the score

Has led a digital or operations transformation project
Not met
Explained that the warehouse system migration was led by the vendor and IT; his part was training and testing.
Evidence source: Recorded interview
Evaluation rationale
Explained that the warehouse system migration was led by the vendor and IT; his part was training and testing.
1. Recorded interview
  Source excerpt
  Not from start to finish. The warehouse system migration was run by the vendor and IT; my part was training the shift leads and testing the scanners.
  04:05 - 04:31
Very importantBaseline gap: 14.3 points
Owns project budgets and cost forecasting
Not met
Budgets were approved and owned by finance; the role only tracked overtime hours.
Evidence source: Experience+1 more source
Evaluation rationale
Budgets were approved and owned by finance; the role only tracked overtime hours.
1. Experience
  Source excerpt
  Budget approval stayed with the regional finance manager; I tracked overtime hours against plan.
2. Recorded interview
  Source excerpt
  Finance does. I track overtime and flag when we’re going over, but I don’t sign off spend.
  15:20 - 15:34
ImportantBaseline gap: 10.7 points
Pending evaluationThese requirements still need evaluation. They are not failed requirements and do not reduce the score.
Leads cross-functional teams without formal authority
Pending evaluation
Not covered by the CV or interviews yet.
Very important

EU AI ActArts. 12 & 14Event logging · Human oversight

Decision record

Pau Vidal · Project Manager, Digital Operations

Requirement: Has led a digital or operations transformation project
Verdict: Not met
Evidence source: Recorded interview
Verbatim excerpt: “Not from start to finish. The warehouse system migration was run by the vendor and IT; my part was training the shift leads and testing the scanners.”; 04:05 - 04:31
Evaluated at: 22 Sept 2026, 10:24 UTC
Evaluated by: BlindStairs engine

Decided by: Laura Martín · Head of Operations; Stage: Reviewing to Interviewing

What you gain

Focus on what you do best: people.
The manual work, leave it to us.

−75%

screening and reporting hours

BlindStairs gathers each person's information, spots what is still missing, drafts the reports and keeps them current. You get that time back for conversations, context and judgement.

A People Operations leader listening carefully to a person during a review conversation

100%

of people considered

No one is left out because time runs short. BlindStairs keeps every person in view throughout the process.

Three People Operations professionals reviewing evidence together

100%

with cited evidence

Every conclusion stays linked to its source, from a CV or interview to a portfolio, cover letter or internal report. The people responsible can inspect the evidence together and explain the decision when it is reviewed.

The decision is always yours. We prepare the evidence; you focus on the people, where you make the difference.

Regulatory framework · EU AI Act

European UnionAnnex III · Point 4

Screening, ranking or selecting with AI is now “high-risk” by law.

Governance, logging, transparency and human oversight are no longer optional. BlindStairs is built to meet them.

Data & governance

Art. 10

The law: examine the data and mitigate bias.

BlindStairs: anonymises sociodemographic signals before inferring; the score doesn't move when you vary them.

See it in step 02: Process every source

Event logging

Art. 12

The law: automatic logging of every decision over the system's lifetime.

BlindStairs: every decision is logged with its evidence, ready to audit.

See it in step 03: Decide with evidence

Transparency

Art. 13

The law: the output must be interpretable and explainable.

BlindStairs: every requirement is cited to its source; explainable before a committee or an inspection.

See it in step 03: Decide with evidence

Human oversight

Art. 14

The law: a person must be able to oversee, intervene and override.

BlindStairs: a person decides; the engine provides the evidence, it doesn't decide.

See it in step 03: Decide with evidence

Other infringements covered by Article 99(4) can carry administrative fines of up to €15M or, for undertakings, 3% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher. Final conformity is yours; we enable it.

Explore the EU AI Act guide

How to start

Less pitch. More proof.

The entry point

Start with a pilot tailored to you

We meet to understand what you expect and agree the scope together. The hands-on pilot then sizes your real deployment.

Then, two ways to work with BlindStairs: something closed and ready, or something open to build on.

Use BlindStairs

SaaS

What: Closed and ready: the complete solution, integrated into your stack or stand-alone.
Billing: Annual fee based on expected usage. Each renewal is renegotiated against the previous year's real usage.

Build on BlindStairs

AIaaS · pay-per-use

What: Open and flexible: build on the engine or integrate it into the systems and workflow in scope. Modular: use only the services you need, partial or full.
Billing: Pay per API usage.

Deployment

Accessible in the cloud, or deployable on a private gateway and on-premise.

30-min scoping session · No commitment

Sharpen your judgment
with efficiency and evidence.

See it on your own decisions, with a pilot tailored to you.

Request a demo

Backed by

Make better decisions in less time, audit-ready.

Co-define the standard

Process every source

Decide with evidence

screening and reporting hours

of people considered

with cited evidence

Screening, ranking or selecting with AI is now “high-risk” by law.

Data & governance

Event logging

Transparency

Human oversight

Start with a pilot tailored to you

Use BlindStairs

Build on BlindStairs

Sharpen your judgment with efficiency and evidence.

Sharpen your judgment
with efficiency and evidence.